{"id":966,"date":"2021-04-12T06:18:54","date_gmt":"2021-04-12T06:18:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.yellowfeverhots.com\/?p=966"},"modified":"2021-04-12T06:18:54","modified_gmt":"2021-04-12T06:18:54","slug":"who-withdraws-pcr-test-recommendation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.yellowfeverhots.com\/corona\/who-withdraws-pcr-test-recommendation\/","title":{"rendered":"WHO withdraws its recommendation for the PCR test"},"content":{"rendered":"
The WHO itself confirms that the COVID-19 PCR tests lead to erroneous results – the lockdown has no scientific basis<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Imagine a pregnancy test at a clinic. After the test is positive, the doctor will ask to repeat the test after a few weeks. What would one think of that? Wouldn’t it be assumed that the doctor does not trust the test he has carried out himself, so that the person may not be pregnant at all? It sounds absurd, but something similar has happened in the case of the COVID-19 PCR testing.<\/p>\n It has not yet got through to most people (because the mainstream media holds back on publishing such findings) – but it is true: The most important health organization in the world, the WHO, withdrew its recommendation for the tests developed by Christian Drosten<\/strong> and colleagues in January 2020. In plain language this means: We made a mistake.<\/strong> But who would expect clear words from the WHO? Therefore, the author of this article has taken the trouble to decipher their rather obscure language.<\/p>\n YFH insertion:<\/strong> Drosten is the virologist puppet of the German state who already messed up by creating panic during the 2009 swine flu hoax, and it is he and his team that developed the first PCR test that was sent over to Wuhan).<\/em><\/p>\n The real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test (rRT-PCR) was recognized on January 23, 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a means of detecting the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This occurred on the recommendation of a virological research group based at the university hospital "Charit\u00e9" in Berlin, which was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.<\/p>\n Exactly one year later, on January 20, 2021, the WHO withdrew its recommendation<\/strong>. They are not saying, “We made a mistake”. Instead, the revocation is carefully worded.<\/p>\n While WHO does not deny the validity of its ambiguous January 2020 guidelines, it nonetheless recommends a “repeat test” – which everyone knows is an impossibility.<\/em><\/p>\n The issue at hand concerns the number of cycles of amplification (Ct). According to the critical Drosten review report<\/a> by a team of scientists led by geneticist Pieter Borger, “the number of amplification cycles should be less than 35, preferably 25 to 30 cycles<\/strong>. In the case of virus detection, with more than 35 cycles only signals are recorded that do not correlate with infectious viruses<\/strong>, as determined by isolation in the cell culture.”<\/p>\n The WHO tacitly admits a year later that all PCR tests performed with an amplification threshold of 35 cycles (Ct) or higher are invalid. But that is exactly what the WHO recommended in January 2020 in consultation with the virology team at the Berlin Charit\u00e9.<\/em><\/p>\n If the test is performed at a Ct value of 35 or higher (as recommended by the WHO), virus segments cannot be detected, which means that all so-called confirmed “positive cases” tabulated over the past 14 months are invalid.<\/p>\n According to the analysis by Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon and other scientists, a Ct greater than 35 “is the norm in most laboratories in Europe and the USA”.<\/p>\n Below you will find the carefully formulated “withdrawal” of the WHO – with emphasis by the author:<\/p>\nPolymerase chain reaction test<\/h2>\n
The number of cycles the test is put through<\/h2>\n
The WHO mea culpa<\/h2>\n